Ask any group of aspiring ultrarunners on social media, “How far is your longest training run before a 50K?” and you’ll get a chorus of “20 miles!” or “26 miles max!”—in metric terms: “32K!” or “42K max!”
While that advice isn’t necessarily wrong, it misses the bigger picture. Fixating on a single “hero run” and aggressively increasing weekly mileage is often a recipe for injury—or even overtraining.
In our coaching practice at Top Of The Trail, we don’t chase mileage on a GPS watch. We build race-specific endurance, mechanical resilience, muscular endurance, and durabilityDurability refers to the time course and magnitude of deterioration in an athlete’s physiological, mechanical, and performance-related characteristics… More (the ability to maintain form and output as fatigue accumulates).
Ultra performance is limited by durability and tissue tolerance, not just aerobic capacity.
The Myth of the “One-Off Hero Run”
The traditional “30-mile peak run” (48 km) is often a psychological crutch. It proves you can do the distance, but the recovery cost is frequently so high that it interrupts training consistency and frequency.
At Top Of The Trail, we’re not big fans of extremely long, single-day training runs. Not because volume is inherently bad, but because concentrating too much mechanical stress into one session often increases injury risk without providing additional benefit. Instead, we prefer multi-day training camps to prepare athletes for the demands of ultra-distance racing.
A multi-day training camp is still a deliberate increase in training load. The difference is that the stress is spread across multiple sessions, reducing peak mechanical strain while still accumulating the fatigue required for ultra-distance performance. The goal isn’t to avoid load, but to apply it in a way that maximizes adaptation while minimizing unnecessary mechanical risk.
Research on mountain ultramarathons shows that neuromuscular fatigue and muscle damage are driven primarily by how mechanical stress is applied—particularly through repeated eccentric loading during descents—rather than by distance alone. The way stress is applied matters more than the raw mileage. For that reason, we favor distributing stress across multiple days rather than concentrating it into a single maximal “hero run.”
The “Training Camp” Strategy
Instead of a single massive run, we usually use two-day training camps. For a 50K or 50-mile race, we generally schedule two or three training camps, ideally spaced 3–4 weeks apart. Whenever possible, the location should reflect the specific demands of the race—surface type, elevation change (climb steepness), and terrain profile. When that’s not feasible, we’ll find a practical workaround.
Why Camps Over Long Runs?
- Time on Feet
Instead of a single ultra-long run, we might do 18 miles (29 km) on day one and another 12 miles (19 km) on day two. This creates a similar accumulated stimulus while avoiding the high-impact damage of running 30 miles (48 km) in one go. - Training Stress Distribution
Ultra performance isn’t dictated by raw mileage alone. By spreading training stress across multiple days, we reduce peak mechanical strain while still exposing the body to the sustained fatigue it must tolerate on race day. - Recovery & Training Continuity
By distributing load across multiple sessions, training camps typically result in less residual muscle damage than a single ultra-long run. Athletes can recover more predictably and return to productive training sooner, preserving consistency across the entire training cycle. - Gear & Gut Checks
Multi-day camps provide the ideal environment to test race gear, fueling, and hydration strategies under real fatigue, when small problems tend to show up.
Naturally, training in the weeks leading up to these camps is structured to prepare athletes for the demands of the camps themselves.
The “Race-as-Training” Option
If the schedule and race specifics allow, we often suggest substituting a training camp with a tune-up race (such as a trail marathon or a 30K). A race environment is the ultimate dress rehearsal for pacing, nutrition, gear, aid-station transitions, and managing race-day nerves, all while accumulating meaningful volume and elevation in a supported setting.
Strength Training & Durability
While this post focuses on how training load is applied, it’s important to acknowledge one critical support for durabilityDurability refers to the time course and magnitude of deterioration in an athlete’s physiological, mechanical, and performance-related characteristics… More in ultra-distance running: strength training.
For ultra runners of all ages, and especially Master’s athletes, strength training is essential. Running alone does not provide the stimulus needed to maintain muscle mass and tissue resilience, certainly with age. Heavy strength work improves force production under fatigue and increases tolerance to the eccentric loads that dominate trail ultras. Skipping strength training doesn’t just limit performance; it increases the risk of mechanical failure late in races.
Training for Longevity
At Top Of The Trail, the goal isn’t just to get you through one 50K; it’s to keep you running for decades. By focusing on concentrated training blocks, vertical specificity, and heavy strength work, we aren’t just training for a finish line—we’re training for longevity.
Ready to stop chasing miles and start training smart? Let’s get to work!
Note: 50K is approximately 31 miles, and 50 miles is approximately 80K.
_____________
Cover image created with AI.
References
The following references provide scientific context for the concepts discussed above.
Maunder, E., Seiler, S., Mildenhall, M. J., Kilding, A. E., & Plews, D. J. (2021). The importance of “durability” in the physiological profiling of endurance athletes. Sports Medicine, 51(8), 1619–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01459-0
Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Santos-Concejero, J., & Grivas, G. V. (2016). Effects of strength training on running economy in highly trained runners: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(8), 2361–2368. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001316
Yamamoto, L. M., Lopez, R. M., Klau, J. F., Casa, D. J., Kraemer, W. J., & Maresh, C. M. (2008). The effects of resistance training on endurance distance running performance among highly trained runners: A systematic review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(6), 2036–2044. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f2f0
Millet, G. Y., Tomazin, K., Verges, S., Vincent, C., Bonnefoy, R., Boisson, R. C., Gergelé, L., Féasson, L., & Martin, V. (2011). Neuromuscular consequences of an extreme mountain ultra-marathon. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e17059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017059

